Moon Sighting Announcements in Saudi Arabia
By Mufti Taqi Usmani
|Q.) I am writing this letter to you with regards to the controversy
surrounding the sighting of the crescent moon over Saudi Arabia on Friday 18 December 1998
and the subsequent commencement of the month of Ramadan in mosques throughout England.
question is: Can such a sighting be acceptable in the face of astronomical data which
suggested that on Friday 18 December 1998 the crescent was invisible due to the Sun, earth
and moon lying in one plane? The data also suggested that the earliest possible sighting
was on Saturday 19 December 1998.
A.) Thank you for your letter asking me about the issue of sighting of
moon at the occasion of Eid-ul-Fitr and about the acceptability of evidence despite its
being impossible according to the astronomical calculations. In fact the contemporary
scholars have different views on this point. I personally believe that if it is certainly
proved that the moon is not yet born and its sighting is not at all possible on a
particular evening, the evidence of only a few persons should not be taken as a proof of
existence of moon at the horizon and the Ramadan or Eid should not be started on that
basis alone unless there is evidence of people in overwhelming numbers that they
themselves have seen the moon in which case it may be said that there was something wrong
in the astronomical calculation. But in the absence of such an evidence, the only evidence
of two or some more persons should not be relied upon. This view of mine is based on the
ruling given by a large number of jurists that if the Horizon is clear the evidence of two
persons is not enough for proving a crescent moon unless it is established by the evidence
of a great number of people about whom it is not is not imaginable that they may have
connived to give a false evidence. The requirement of such an overwhelming evidence in
this case is based on the common sense that if the horizon is clear the moon must have
been seen by a large number of people and merely the evidence of two persons is doubtful.
By the analogy, if the astronomical calculation proved that new moon cannot be sighted on
a particular day the evidence of a few people should not be relied upon.
However, there are some contemporary scholars who totally disregard the astronomical
calculations in the matter of sighting the moon and base their view on the famous Hadith
of the Holy Prophet, Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam "Keep fast after seeing it (moon)
and give up fasting after seeing it (moon)." Their argument is that the Shariah does
not base its findings on the astronomical calculations because it is meant for all the
Muslims the majority of whom have no means to know the results of such calculations.
Therefore, they say, reliance can be placed only on the evidence of the persons who claim
to have seen the moon. This is the view which has found favor with the Saudi authorities
who are responsible for declaring the sighting or otherwise of the moon. Although I do not
endorse this view, nor do other scholars of many Muslims countries accept it, yet the
issue being a matter of Ijtihad, the decision given by Saudi authorities is enforceable in
their own jurisdiction. That is why, despite having a different view, we validate the Hajj
and Ramadan etc, as announced by the Saudi authorities [for applicability within Saudi
Arabia]. The Muslims living in other parts of the world should desirably arrange their own
system of sighting the moon, as is done in Pakistan and many other countries, because the
system adopted in Saudi Arabia is not based on the stronger view. However, as I mentioned
earlier this is not an issue which has been specifically mentioned in the Holy Qur'an or
Sunnah in express terms but it is a matter of Ijtihad, therefore, we should not hold that
any decision taken on that basis, whether in Saudi Arabia or in any other country, is
totally against Shariah and the worship or celebrations held on that basis are invalid.
This is my humble opinion regarding this issue and according to me the Muslims living in
UK etc. should preferably make their own arrangement for sighting of the moon. However, if
the dissension of the Muslims cannot be removed except by declaring the beginning of the
months on the basis of the announcement of the Saudi authorities then the adoption of
Saudi view is less harmful than inculcating the dissension among the Muslims,
particularly, in a non-Muslim country.